The conference season is suddenly upon us! The lab will be out in full force this year since many of the first people to join the lab have cool results to report. Everyone has received various competitive grants to help support their travel, which is superb news! We are all looking forward to good feedback and hearing about the latest in evolutionary biology from across the world. Do come and chat if you spot us.
Kruttika and Aparna are off to the Evolution meeting in Portland, Oregon. Aparna is supported by a DST travel grant.
Mrudula, Saurabh, Gaurav and I will be at the SMBE meeting in Austin, Texas. Mrudula has a DBT travel grant, Gaurav has a DST travel grant, and Saurabh has a CSIR travel fellowship.
After SMBE, Mrudula and I will hop over to the GRC on Microbial Population Biology in New Hampshire.
Meanwhile, Saurabh will spend some time visiting labs in Boston and then attend the MBL Workshop on Molecular Evolution at Woods Hole. Saurabh has received funding support from MBL as well as CSIR.
In August, Mrudula, Gaurav and Saurabh will join me in Barcelona, Spain, to teach in the School of Molecular and Theoretical Biology.
Finally, to wrap up the summer: Aparna, Kruttika and I will participate in the ESEB meeting in Groningen, Netherlands. Aparna has received an ESEB travel award to attend this meeting.
Recently I wrote a Primer (a short tutorial/introduction for a subject of broad interest) to accompany a new paper in PLoS Biology demonstrating stress-specific mutation spectra in E. coli (Maharjan and Ferenci 2017). Stress-induced mutagenesis (SIM) is a fascinating phenomenon, whereby some organisms show a transient increase in mutation rates when exposed to stresses such as starvation. However, the evolutionary implications of this phenomenon have been controversial, and I give a brief introduction to this debate (and potential ways forward) in my Primer. In their paper, Maharjan and Ferenci show that not all stresses induce mutagensis, but each stress produces a unique distribution of mutational types. These results suggest that stress-specific mutation spectra may influence evolutionary trajectories in a stress-specific manner. This remains to be explicitly tested, but we are now a little bit closer to understanding the evolutionary consequences of SIM.
The Primer and the related paper are available online, if you would like to know more.
Aparna, Kruttika and I recently wrote a short review article on insect bacterial associations, that was featured in the March 2017 newsletter of the Indian Society of Cell Biology. We’d like to share it here since it might be of general interest. Enjoy!
A PARTNERSHIP STORY: INSECT-BACTERIAL ASSOCIATIONS
Aparna Agarwal, Kruttika Phalnikar and Deepa Agashe
National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS), Bangalore
The world around us is full of microbes that influence both biotic and abiotic components of ecosystems. For instance, nitrogen-fixing bacteria enrich the soil1, and algae in marine ecosystems provide sustenance to a variety of organisms2,3. On the other hand, pathogenic bacteria cause diseases across trophic levels, changing the environment around them dramatically. Such interactions have been extensively studied for a long period of time. However, non-pathogenic host-bacterial associations also influence host physiology and even host behaviour4,5. For example, in mice, differences in gut bacterial communities determine utilization of specific dietary components and the propensity for diseases like obesity and diabetes6,7. Gut bacteria are also linked to several neurological disorders such as depression and anxiety8. Such dependence of animal hosts on their gut microbes is not limited to humans, but extends across the tree of life.
On 31 Aug 2017, NCBS will host a one-day competition for 3-minute talks in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. The event is jointly organized by multiple institutes in Bangalore to encourage cross-talk within local ecology circles.
If you have an interesting story from your work, consider competing! You can find more details here.
We said a fond farewell to Imroze Khan, the first postdoc from the lab. Over the last 4 years or so, Imroze initiated and led work on the ecology and evolution of insect immune function. He is now an Assistant Professor at Ashoka University, where he will continue to work with insect life history and immune function.
All organisms age. One prominent hypothesis suggests that infections experienced early in life accelerate ageing. In collaboration with Jens Rolff, Imroze tested this idea in mealworm beetles (Tenebrio molitor). He found that young beetles injected with bacterial cell components mounted an immune response that damaged their vital organs – Malpighian tubules, equivalent to kidneys – and resulted in faster ageing. Experimental down-regulation of phenoloxidase (a key component of the immune response) via RNAi allowed beetles to live longer. Similarly, older beetles infected with a live pathogen also lived longer if their immune response was suppressed. Thus, inflammation induced by immune responses may generally accelerate ageing in various contexts. These results suggest that natural selection is nearly blind to immune self-harm because its effects are felt later in life, after peak reproduction. Similar mechanisms may operate in other organisms, as ageing is a feature of most multi-cellular organisms including humans.
Read the early online version of the paper here.
Welcome to Deepa Agashe’s lab at the National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS), Bangalore!
Our campus recently hosted an open Science day, when hundreds of school students visited the campus and explored exhibits set up by students and postdocs from many labs. All accounts suggest this was a lot of fun for everyone. Here is an article describing the events.
Here are some pictures of our lab’s tables showcasing different rice varieties, bacteria associated with various plants, animals and inanimate objects, an activity highlighting the role of chance in evolution, and our favourite beetles. Thanks to Laasya, Aparna, Pratibha, Aditi, Anurag, and Parth for making all this interesting!
Traditionally, immune memory was thought to be restricted to vertebrates; such adaptive immunity is the reason why early vaccination protects us from later infection. However, a large body of recent work suggests that many insects also show a form of immune memory, whereby exposure to a low dose of a pathogen improves an individual’s response to a subsequent infection with the same pathogen. Although we do not understand the physiological and molecular mechanisms responsible for such immune “priming”, the response may be costly and is often specific to the pathogen (even the strain), suggesting that priming may be an adaptive trait. If so, the strength of the priming response should vary depending on, e.g., selection imposed by local pathogens and the specific costs of mounting the priming response. However, no one had quantified variation in the priming response. We tackled this problem in our latest paper in Ecology and Evolution.
Imroze and Arun did an enormous study to measure the immune priming response of 10 different wild-collected populations of flour beetles as a function of sex and life stage of priming. As predicted, they found substantial variation in the priming response across populations. Interestingly, they also found that ontogenic priming (when larvae are primed, and then infected as adults) conferred the largest survival benefits compared to within-stage or trans-generation priming. These are exciting results because they show that priming is not a ubiquitous response, and set up clear predictions about the relative benefits and costs of priming as a function of stage and sex. The results are also consistent with (though they do not directly support) the hypothesis that priming should evolve under local, specific and strong pathogen pressure. We are now moving ahead with efforts to determine factors responsible for the observed variability in the priming response. Watch this space for more!
Our campus recently hosted a conference on Conflict and Cooperation in Cellular Populations (CCCP), featuring a wonderfully diverse set of talks and participants alike. Kruttika presented a poster summarizing her results on the bacterial communities of butterflies, and Laasya put up a last-minute poster on the benefits of altered initiator tRNA content in E. coli. We’re very happy that both of them won prizes for their posters! Congratulations!